## IMIS & AMIS

**A** most interesting paper by Adrian Raftery and Le Bao appeared in the Early View section of * Biometrics*. It aims at better predictions for HIV prevalence—in the original UNAIDS implementation, a naïve SIR procedure was used, based on the prior as importance function, which sometimes resulted in terrible degeneracy—, but its methodological input is about

*incremental mixture importance sampling*(IMIS), thus relates to the general topic of adaptive Monte Carlo methods I am interested in. (And to some extent to our recent AMIS paper.) Actually, a less elaborate (and less related) version of the IMIS algorithm first appeared in a 2006 paper by Steele, Raftery and Edmond in

**in the setting of finite mixture likelihoods and I somehow managed to miss it…**

*JCGS***R**aftery and Bao propose to replace SIR with an iterative importance sampling technique developed in 2003 by Steele et al. that has some similarities with population Monte Carlo (PMC). (A negligible misrepresentation of PMC in the current paper is that our method does *not* use “the prior as importance function’”.) In its current format, the IMIS algorithm starts from a first guess (e.g., the prior distribution) and builds a sequence of Gaussian (or Gaussian mixture) approximations whose parameters are estimated from the current population, while all simulation are *merged together* at each step, using a mixture stabilising weight

where the weights depend on the number of simulations at step *r*. This pattern also appears in our *adaptive multiple importance sampling* (AMIS) algorithm developed in this arXiv paper with Jean-Marie Cornuet, Jean-Michel Marin and Antonietta Mira, and in the original paper by Owen and Zhou (2000, JASA) that inspired us. Raftery and Bo extend the methodology to an IMIS with optimisation at the initial stage, while AMIS incorporates the natural population Monte Carlo stepwise optimisation developed in Douc et al. (2008, *Annals of Statistics*) that brings the proposal kernel closer to the target after each iteration. The application of the simulations to conduct model choice found in the current paper and in Steele et al. can also be paralleled with the one using population Monte Carlo we conducted for cosmological data in MNRAS.

**I**nterestingly, Raftery and Bo (and also Steele et al.) refer to the defensive mixture paper of Hesterberg (1995, Technometrics), which has been very influential in my research on importance sampling, and (less directly) to Owen and Zhou (2000, JASA), who did propose the deterministic mixture scheme that inspired AMIS. Besides the foundational papers of Oh and Berger (1991, JASA) and West (1993, *J. Royal Statistical Society Series B*), they also mention a paper by Raghavan and Cox (1998, *J. Statistical Simulation & Computation*) I was not aware of, which introduces as well a mixture of importance proposals as a variance stabilising technique.

February 15, 2012 at 12:14 pm

[...] many delays and exchanges of emails, our AMIS paper with Jean-Marie Cornuet, Jean-Michel Marin and Antonietta Mira eventually made it into the [...]

December 19, 2010 at 12:04 am

[...] a thorough revision that removed most of the theoretical attempts at improving our understanding of AMIS convergence, we have now resubmitted the AMIS paper to Scandinavian Journal of Statistics and arXived the new [...]

August 2, 2010 at 12:14 am

[...] is a bit extra-galactic, even at light speed, so I will scrap all the technical sections on PMC, AMIS and focus on the implementation for the cosmology [...]

July 31, 2010 at 11:02 pm

Ugh! I thought I’d fully discredited the so-called SIR in my 1992 paper. It’s horrible to think that people still are going around doing this.

Then again, they’re still doing the so-called Fisher exact test, which I debunked in my 2003 paper; they’re still doing the harmonic mean importance sampling estimator, which just about everyone has debunked; etc etc etc.