Following my never-ending series of posts on the book Error and Inference, (edited) by Deborah Mayo and Ari Spanos (and kindly sent to me by Deborah), I decided to edit those posts into a (slightly) more coherent document, now posted on arXiv. And to submit it as a book review to Siam Review, even though I had not high expectations it fits the purpose of the journal: the review was rejected between the submission to arXiv and the publication of this post!
This entry was posted on November 29, 2011 at 12:11 am and is filed under Books, Statistics, University life with tags Bayesian tests, book review, Error and Inference, Neyman-Pearson, philosophy of sciences, R.A. Fisher, Siam Review, testing of hypotheses. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
March 12, 2012 at 7:39 pm
[...] few days ago, while in Roma, I got the good news that my review of Error and Inference had been accepted by Theory and Decision. Great! Then today I got a second [...]
March 5, 2012 at 2:01 pm
I just received a reply from Theory & Decision that my review is accepted as is. Great.
December 9, 2011 at 12:16 pm
The review was also rejected by the journal Philosophy of Science as being too long a review and not broad enough a research paper. I just resubmitted it to Bayesian Analysis.
December 23, 2011 at 2:34 am
I think if Bayesian analysis takes it, say, that it would be constructive to allow Aris and I to respond briefly to the main issues. Do you agree? In the mean time, I’ll get to it bit by bit in my blog (though much of the concerns have already been addressed more generally).
December 24, 2011 at 6:46 pm
Alas, Bayesian Analysis rejected the extended review on the basis that it does not publish book reviews… Next attempt is presumably Theory & Decision.
December 6, 2011 at 12:13 am
[...] connection with my series of posts on the book Error and Inference, and my recent collation of those into an arXiv document, Deborah Mayo has started a series of informal seminars at the LSE [...]