<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ABC as knn&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xianblog.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/abc-as-knn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xianblog.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/abc-as-knn/</link>
	<description>an attempt at bloggin, from scratch...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:52:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith O'Rourke</title>
		<link>http://xianblog.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/abc-as-knn/comment-page-1/#comment-24663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith O'Rourke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xianblog.wordpress.com/?p=17513#comment-24663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neat, if you can efficiently search Andrew G&#039;s blog, I proposed Bayes as inherently being a k-nearest neighbour  procedure in 2005/6. I had, in a pinch, come up with (what Don Rubin used in his 1984 paper) a two stage sampling model in order to explain Bayes to Epi students.

Not that I did anything with it (or could I with computational resources back then), but I remember the clear lack of enthusiam to see it that way.  

It just seemed wrong or worse too simple!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat, if you can efficiently search Andrew G&#8217;s blog, I proposed Bayes as inherently being a k-nearest neighbour  procedure in 2005/6. I had, in a pinch, come up with (what Don Rubin used in his 1984 paper) a two stage sampling model in order to explain Bayes to Epi students.</p>
<p>Not that I did anything with it (or could I with computational resources back then), but I remember the clear lack of enthusiam to see it that way.  </p>
<p>It just seemed wrong or worse too simple!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
