Top 15 all-timers?

Next year, I will organise a reading seminar for my graduate students so that they all read the “classics” of Statistics. Originally,  I planned to use the book Biometrika: One Hundred Years by Mike Titterington and David Cox, but there are not enough papers in it, so I expanded the list and ended with the following. This is a poll so please vote for the 15 top papers all students should have read or add the missing ones. (Of course, those are supposed to be “classics”, so 2009 preprints are not appropriate!)

6 Responses to “Top 15 all-timers?”

  1. […] 在讀某個統計學者的 blog ,他要求 PhD students 講 talk […]

  2. […] an earlier post and poll. six of my graduate students took the Reading Classics seminar this year (plus two who dropped […]

  3. […] el blog de Christian Robert se ha publicado una encuesta acerca de los artículos que se debieran […]

  4. […] Thanks to the 189 votes on the papers, here are the selected top […]

  5. About EM algorithm, I’d add
    @ARTICLE{Wu1983,
    author = {C. F. J. Wu},
    title = {On the Convergence Properties of the {EM} Algorithm},
    journal = {Annals of Statistics},
    year = {1983},
    volume = {11},
    pages = {95–103},
    }
    which is a must read (maybe more than the original Dempster et al).

    I’d also add the overlooked and very, very short
    @ARTICLE{Zehna1966,
    author = {Zehna, Peter W.},
    title = {Invariance of Maximum Likelihood Estimators},
    journal = {Annals of Mathematical Statistics},
    year = {1966},
    volume = {37},
    pages = {744},
    }
    and its very clean correction
    @ARTICLE{Berk1967,
    author = {Berk, R.H.},
    title = {Review 1922 of ‘Invariance of Maximum Likelihood Estimators’ by Peter W. Zehna},
    journal = {Mathematical Reviews},
    year = {1967},
    volume = {33},
    pages = {343-344}
    }
    who try to really define the maximum-likelihood estimator of $f(\theta)$ when $f$ is not one-to-one. Not as brilliant as the others in the list, of course, but worth having a look at.

    In a totally different field, the following is a definite must-read in non linear design of experiments:
    @ARTICLE{Box1959,
    author = {Box, G.E.P. and Lucas, H.L.},
    title = {Design of Experiments in Nonlinear Situations},
    journal = {Biometrika},
    year = {1959},
    volume = {46},
    pages = {77-90}
    }

  6. FOULLEY Jean-Louis Says:

    Christian/Very good idea to include some classics in your teaching programme for graduate students.
    What people have in mind about “classics” is actually a matter of debate. But in an historical perspective I would add at least one paper by RA Fisher, although most of them are difficult to read. May be “Theory of Statistical Estimation” (1922) as it laid the foundations of modern inference.
    A more applied choice could be the 1936 one on mixtures with the famous “Iris” example. But this man has tackled some many subjects in statistics that we are spoilt for choice.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.