Comments on: Statistical Inference
https://xianblog.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/statistical-inference/
an attempt at bloggin, nothing more...Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:12:33 +0000
hourly
1 http://wordpress.com/
By: Model weights for model choice « Xi'an's Og
https://xianblog.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/statistical-inference/comment-page-1/#comment-8309
Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:12:33 +0000http://xianblog.wordpress.com/?p=7793#comment-8309[…] for parameters not present in the model inder examination, as well as a more general critique in your recent review of M. Aitkin’s recent […]
]]>
By: Do we need an integrated Bayesian/likelihood inference? « Xi'an's Og
https://xianblog.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/statistical-inference/comment-page-1/#comment-7377
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:10:58 +0000http://xianblog.wordpress.com/?p=7793#comment-7377[…] with Andrew Gelman and Judith Rousseau, we turned our separate readings of Murray Aitkin’s Statistical Inference into a discussion paper, now arXived. This paper […]
]]>
By: Bayesian model selection « Xi'an's Og
https://xianblog.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/statistical-inference/comment-page-1/#comment-7052
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 06:37:07 +0000http://xianblog.wordpress.com/?p=7793#comment-7052[…] of mathematics at Université Paris Diderot a few days ago and the post on Murray Aitkin’s alternative, and the computational aspects of the resulting Bayesian procedures, including evidence, the […]
]]>
By: Seminar of philosophy [ex-post] « Xi'an's Og
https://xianblog.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/statistical-inference/comment-page-1/#comment-6926
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:16:14 +0000http://xianblog.wordpress.com/?p=7793#comment-6926[…] to get there in time and talked about Bayesian model choice and of the difficulties with Murray Aitkin’s proposal. The talk was presumably much too mathematical and not philosophical enough, but it was followed by […]
]]>
By: Seminar of philosophy of mathematics [slides] « Xi'an's Og
https://xianblog.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/statistical-inference/comment-page-1/#comment-6782
Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:33:40 +0000http://xianblog.wordpress.com/?p=7793#comment-6782[…] The first version of my slides for the Seminar of philosophy of mathematics at Université Paris Diderot, in ten days, is completed. I recycled some of the slides I had done for the debate in Rimini more than a year ago, since they included quotes from different perspectives on what model choice and testing should be. However, I removed completely the computational side and included instead some comments on the ABC controversy and from my recent review of Murray Aitkin’s Statistical Inference. […]
]]>
By: Seminar of philosophy of mathematics « Xi'an's Og
https://xianblog.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/statistical-inference/comment-page-1/#comment-6740
Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:15:51 +0000http://xianblog.wordpress.com/?p=7793#comment-6740[…] that I will draw from my recent reading of Aitkin’s book, as well as from the controversy with […]
]]>