Seminar of philosophy [ex-post]

Yesterday, I gave my talk at the Seminar of philosophy of mathematics at Université Paris Diderot, in this new district of Paris where I always get lost because construction work continuously modifies the topology of the place. (This year, I ended up biking the mythical Rue Watt which has been beautifully renovated.) I managed nonetheless to get there in time and talked about Bayesian model choice and of the difficulties with Murray Aitkin’s proposal. The talk was presumably much too mathematical and not philosophical enough, but it was followed by a discussion launched by the two following speakers, Jan Sprenger and Bengt Autzen. Due to teaching duties, I could only attend the talk by Jan Sprenger, who covered the philosophical aspects of the difficulty in defining objective Bayesian inference, alas missing both Bengt’s and Steve Fienberg’s talks… He mostly focussed on MaxEnt priors, with an interesting counterexample by Teddy Seidenfeld, but also mentioned reference priors as suffering from the same difficulties. From my (non-philosophical) perspective, I consider that MaxEnt priors are beyond in terms of objectivity, because they first require the definition of a reference measure for the (entropy) divergence to be defined. During the talk, Jan also mentioned the book In Defence of Objective Bayesianism by Jon Williamson, which I will try to read (and comment) in the coming months. I just had a few words with who told me he had worked on Seber’s Evidence and Evolution as part of his PhD thesis, so I wished we had had more time to chat about that! (Steve has proposed to give his talk at the students’ seminar here in CREST so that we can discuss effects of causes versus causes of effects.)

3 Responses to “Seminar of philosophy [ex-post]”

  1. […] because I feel there is no equivalence between ABC estimation and ABC testing. As in many other instances, the two inferential problems differ immensely!!! When estimating the parameter of a statistical […]

  2. […] (see the abstract below) this afternoon at CREST, as part of the PhD students’ seminar (as mentionned by Xian). Room 28 at 4 pm. He gave this talk on Tuesday at the Seminar of philosophy of mathematics […]

  3. We will welcome Steve’s talk with much pleasure!

Leave a Reply to ABC model choice not to be trusted [3] « Xi'an's Og Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.