NYT obituary & reviews

I was taking advantage of being in the US a Sunday to read the Sunday edition of the NYT yesterday and I came upon the obituary for Paul Meier, “the” Meier in the Kaplan-Meier estimator. (The NYT  actually notes that the corresponding JASA paper has been quoted more than 35,000 times!) I also learned from the NYT that Paul Meier was one of the first proponents of randomization in medical trials.

There was also an interesting review of George Martin’s  A Dance with Dragons that is waiting for me at home! Sailing the Bahamas last week means I missed the review of Sharon McGrayne’s the theory that would not die, written by John Paulos. Here is his concluding paragraph (I won’t comment since I have not read Sharon’s book yet!):

Statistics is an imperialist discipline that can be applied to almost any area of science or life, and this litany of applications is intended to be the unifying thread that sews the book into a coherent whole. It does so, but at the cost of giving it a list-like, formulaic feel. More successful are McGrayne’s vivifying sketches of the statisticians who devoted themselves to Bayesian polemics and counterpolemics. As McGrayne amply shows, orthodox Bayesians have long been opposed, sometimes vehemently, by so-called frequentists, who have objected to their tolerance for subjectivity. The nub of the differences between them is that for Bayesians the prior can be a subjective expression of the degree of belief in a hypothesis, even one about a unique event or one that has as yet never occurred. For frequentists the prior must have a more objective foundation; ideally that is the relative frequency of events in repeatable, well-defined experiments. McGrayne’s statisticians exhibit many differences, and she cites the quip that you can nevertheless always tell them apart by their posteriors, a good word on which to end.

One Response to “NYT obituary & reviews”

  1. I re-read the review after reading the book. Actually, this is the only paragraph giving Paulos’ opinion about the book. The previous parts are about Paulos’ summary of Bayesian theory. With his criticism of the subjectivity of priors…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.