arXiv bonanza!
Today, there is an avalanche of interesting titles published on arXiv, enough fodder for weeks of ‘Oggin’…!
[1] arXiv:1311.1189 [pdf, other] Statistical Inference in Hidden Markov Models using $k$-segment Constraints Michalis K. Titsias, Christopher Yau, Christopher C. Holmes Comments: 37 pages
[2] arXiv:1311.1138 [pdf, other] Analysis of the Gibbs sampler for hierarchical inverse problems Sergios Agapiou, Johnathan M. Bardsley, Omiros Papaspiliopoulos, Andrew M. Stuart
[3] arXiv:1311.1131 [pdf, ps, other] Compatible Weighted Proper Scoring Rules Peter G. M. Forbes Biometrika (2012) 99 (4): 989-994
[4] arXiv:1311.1129 [pdf, other] Discussion of “Geodesic Monte Carlo on Embedded Manifolds” Simon Byrne, Mark Girolami, Persi Diaconis, Christof Seiler, Susan Holmes, Ian L. Dryden, John T. Kent, Marcelo Pereyra, Babak Shahbaba, Shiwei Lan, Jeffrey Streets, Daniel Simpson Comments: Discussion of arXiv:1301.6064. To appear in the Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 18 pages
[5] arXiv:1311.1067 [pdf, ps, other] Approximation of improper prior by vague priors Christele Bioche, Pierre Druilhet Comments: 30 pages
[7] arXiv:1311.1039 [pdf, other] Maximum penalized likelihood estimation in semiparametric capture-recapture modelsThéo Michelot, Roland Langrock, Thomas Kneib, Ruth King
[8] arXiv:1311.1033 [pdf, other]Nonparametric Bayesian models of hierarchical structure in complex networks Mikkel N. Schmidt, Tue Herlau, Morten Mørup
[9] arXiv:1311.0907 [pdf, other] Bayesian inference on the Stiefel manifold Vinayak Rao, Lizhen Lin, David B. Dunson
[11] arXiv:1311.1027 (cross-list from math.PR) [pdf, ps, other] Perfect Simulation of Determinantal Point Processes Laurent Decreusefond (LTCI), Ian Flint (LTCI), Kah Choon Low (LTCI)
[20] arXiv:1311.0689 [pdf, other] Particle filter-based Gaussian Process Optimisation for Parameter Inference Johan Dahlin, Fredrik Lindsten
[21] arXiv:1311.0686 [pdf, other] Second-order Particle MCMC for Bayesian Parameter Inference Johan Dahlin, Fredrik Lindsten, Thomas B. Schön
[22] arXiv:1311.0674 [pdf, ps, other] On the use of marginal posteriors in marginal likelihood estimation via importance-sampling K. Perrakis, I. Ntzoufras, E.G. Tsionas
Xi'an's Og 
November 6, 2013 at 11:36 pm
Damn: you missed mine! http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.0081
It’s a much more novel and interesting treatment of the issue than you might think. (Yes, I do say so myself :-)
November 6, 2013 at 6:06 pm
A quick comment on “Analysis of the Gibbs sampler for hierarchical inverse problems Sergios Agapiou, Johnathan M. Bardsley, Omiros Papaspiliopoulos, Andrew M. Stuart” from just reading the introduction (which is probably not a good thing, but nevertheless):
I hope they’ve solved a more general problem than the one stated in the introduction, because:
a) Gibbs samplers don’t work very well on that problem, and
b) Given that the full conditional [u | y, parameters] is Gaussian, we then have by Bayes’ rule the (2 dimensional) posterior for the parameters that can be normalised numerically. The two dimensional parameters can then be marginalised out by numerical integration (or pure MC if you desperately want unbiasedness).
This problem only really becomes interesting when the observation process is non-Gaussian, in which case a whole lot of work has been done. See, for example,
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10994-013-5388-x
for a *very* detailed comparison of different methods for dealing with the hierarchical structure.
There is essentially no difference between inverse problems [with simple forward maps] and the harder problems considered by Filippone et al. (e.g. they both have [ideally, but not computationally] infinite dimensional priors)
November 6, 2013 at 6:30 pm
almost a post on its own, Dan..!
November 6, 2013 at 7:03 pm
You know me – I’m quite wordy :p
November 6, 2013 at 7:04 pm
(especially when I get really excited about the title and the author list, and then really disappointed by the introduction)
November 6, 2013 at 7:08 pm
Just move to the next on the list then. Such a (potential) wealth of papers led me to propose “speed-arXivin” to our students: at one end of the weekly seminar, they would all have two minutes sharp to summarise one recent arXiv posting of their (dis)liking… This way there would be a minimal cost in not separating chaff from wheat first!
November 6, 2013 at 7:10 pm
That sounds like fun :p
(It would be also a good lesson in the power of a well written introduction)