ERC panel [step #2]

Another post that was written ages ago, about the second round of the European Research Council (ERC) panel on starting grants for mathematics in which I took part as an expert and not as an applicant. While anonymity possibly fell apart for the several dozens of applicants who were shortlisted for interview, in particular more like those few from my own field, the official list of the panel only came out much later. The interviews were quite interesting, obviously, with a strict attention to time and questions to make all interviews as “equal” as possible. And sometimes painful to attend as the candidates were visibly stressed and more over-prepared than not. Which did not necessarily help as the preparation, presumably with the help of local consultants out of maths, had removed some of the enthusiasm behind the project and too much of the maths. I think we all stopped breathing when one applicant broke mid-sentence, as in a theatre play when one actor forgets one’s lines… The rehearsal does not work so well for later questions, even though preparing for these is also essential,  and some upgrading or downgrading may then occur because of a single answer. An unavoidable limitation of the exercise.

Overall I remain impressed by the quality of the collective work of the panel [despite a gruelling schedule on interview days] and of the overall selection of eleven projects, even though it sounds like more theoretical and abstract topics seem privileged, in a bias that seems difficult to counteract. And [not because no statistics proposal was selected this time] making me (and others) wonder whether or not a separate statistics section of the ERC would not be more appropriate, since statistics proposals are not uniquely and solely centred on the maths aspects.

2 Responses to “ERC panel [step #2]”

  1. Guido Consonni Says:

    Totally agree that something should be done for ERC applications in Statistical Methodology. I was told that the statistical community started discussing this topic (RSS and possibly other societies) a while ago, but nothing happened. I cannot fully understand why i see several (very good) economists getting ERC grants, and I see so few (very good) statisticans getting grants. This is especially true in the physical science and engineering where Maths, and hence Statistics, is located. Admittedly, I know a couple of statisticians who got ERC grants within Life Sciences and Social Sciences. But then their application was strongly focussed on an applied topic. it would be useful to re-start the conversation involving European statistical societies and other institutions, collecting data on the issue, and making proposals to give a greater chance to grants based on statistical methods.

    • Thanks Guido. The last advanced ERC grant allocations saw two (non-parametric) statisticians selected, including Judith! (Disclaimer: I was not part of this panel.) So not all is lost, even though the picture is not all rosy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.