another Cauchy peculiarity [aka the witch of Agnesi]

Photograph of Augustin Cauchy, ca. 1856, downloaded from The Smithonians libraries (c.) Wikipedia Following a homework question on X validated, easily solved by a change of variables, I realised that the distribution of X/(X+Y) when X and Y are iid N(0,1) is again a Cauchy distribution but with both location and scale equal to ½! That the scale is ½ sort of makes sense due to the numerator being half (in distribution!) of the denominator, but the decentering of the distribution is more puzzling. And it does hold in the sense that

> median(1/(1+rnorm(1e6)/rnorm(1e6)))
[1] 0.4990263
> median(abs(.5-1/(1+rnorm(1e6)/rnorm(1e6))))
[1] 0.5014334

With the even more amazing

> mean(1/(1+rnorm(1e6)/rnorm(1e6)))
[1] 0.4796456

Well (spoiler!) the last result was actually cherry-picked out of two dozens attempts as the closest to .5! With the other values wildly variable… Another answer by W. Huber gives the intuition behind the ½ since

x/(x+y) = ½ + ½ (x-y)/(x+y)

Cauchy being a local (in the sense that he is buried in Sceaux!, in the same cemetery as Galois whose research he supported despite being usually accused of having rejected his papers), with a rather nasty reputation!, and as I had had a drink with Steve Stigler the day before, I looked around for the true originator of Cauchy’s distribution, who is Simeon Poisson, true to Stigler’s eponym law!, who used it as a counter-example to the Law of Large Numbers. Later, Cauchy used the distribution (without acknowledging Poisson) as a counter example in a dispute with Bienaymé on the most probable nature of the least square estimator. The name of “witch of Agnesi” is pointed out in Steve’s 1974 Biometrika paper, making reference to the mathematician Maria Agnesi (1718-1799) who used the denomination, unrelated with the weird statistical properties of the “Cauchy” distribution.

2 Responses to “another Cauchy peculiarity [aka the witch of Agnesi]”

  1. Gerard Letac Says:

    Il te faut savoir que si X\sim C_{a+ib}=bdx/((x-a)^2+b^2) alors pour toute homographie h croissante la loi de h(X) est $C(h(a+ib))$. Plus de details dans ‘which functions preserve Cauchy laws’ Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society dans les annees 1986 ou 7.

Leave a Reply to xi'an Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.