## one or two?

**A** superposition of two random walks from The Riddler:

Starting from zero, a random walk is produced by choosing moves between ±1 and ±2 at each step. If the choice between both is made towards maximising the probability of ending up positive after 100 steps, what is this probability?

Although the optimal path is not necessarily made of moves that optimise the probability of ending up positive after the remaining steps, I chose to follow a dynamic programming approach by picking between ±1 and ±2 at each step based on that probability:

bs=matrix(0,405,101) #best stategy with value i-203 at time j-1 bs[204:405,101]=1 for (t in 100:1){ tt=2*t bs[203+(-tt:tt),t]=.5*apply(cbind( bs[204+(-tt:tt),t+1]+bs[202+(-tt:tt),t+1], bs[201+(-tt:tt),t+1]+bs[205+(-tt:tt),t+1]),1,max)}

resulting in the probability

> bs[203,1] [1] 0.6403174

Just checking that a simple strategy of picking ±1 above zero and ±2 below leads to the same value

ga=rep(0,T) for(v in 1:100) ga=ga+(1+(ga<1))*sample(c(-1,1),T,rep=TRUE)

or sort of

> mean(ga>0) [1] 0.6403494

With highly similar probabilities when switching at ga<2

> mean(ga>0) [1] 0.6403183

or ga<0

> mean(ga>0) [1] 0.6403008

and too little difference to spot a significant improvement between the three boundaries.

March 13, 2020 at 7:14 am

[…] article was first published on R – Xi'an's Og, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here) […]

March 12, 2020 at 8:45 am

[…] by data_admin [This article was first published on R – Xi’an’s Og, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page […]