## Archive for MathJax

## page overflow

Posted in Books, Kids, Statistics with tags algebra, CNRS, conjugate normal model, cross validated, LaTeX, MathJax, Overleaf, PLMlatex on March 17, 2021 by xi'an## on-line course

Posted in Kids, pictures, Statistics, University life with tags courses in English, drawing tablet, Huion, LaTeX, MathJax, multiple choice question, on-line course, pdf, questionnaire, teaching, Université Paris Dauphine, xournalpp on September 4, 2020 by xi'an**S**ince this teaching semester is 100% on-line in Paris Dauphine for the third year students, I started last Monday to teach my statistical modelling course from my office on my computer. Using a Teams connection with the 180⁺ students, sharing my slides *or* my webcam with them, and writing on a Huion drawing tablet to write on the pdf slides (or on Teams whiteboard). I found the most convenient way to write on the slides was via Xournalpp. From my end of the exchange, the class went on rather smoothly, with students interacting about the practical and contents of the course. As I have also recorded my lectures (in August), and hope the students to first go through the recordings, I will see next time how much effort they have put into assimilating the material, as the on-line class will mostly concentrate on questions and applications. I also hope to have a quick multiple choice question at the end (or beginning?) of each class, but am still fishing for an interface that would (a) handle LaTeX or MathJax (b) shuffle questions from a pool of questions so that each student gets a different question (or thinks so) and (c) store the outcome of the test. Any suggestion welcome!

## natural LaTeX

Posted in Books, Statistics, University life with tags LaTeX, MathJax, Nature, StackExchange, typesetting, word processors, Word versus LaTeX on July 13, 2019 by xi'an**N**ature must have been out of inspiration in the past weeks for running a two-page article on L^{a}T_{e}X [as the toolbox column] and how it compares with… Word! Which is not so obvious since most articles in Nature are not involving equations (much) and are from fields where Word prevails. Besides the long-running whine that LaTeX is not he selling argument for this article seemed to be the increasing facility to use (basic) LaTeX commands in forums (like Stack Exchange) and blogs (like WordPress) via MathJax. But the author also pushes for the lighter (R?)Markdown as, “in LaTeX, there is a greater risk that contributors will make changes that prevent the code compiling into a PDF” (which does not make sense to me). This tribune also got me to find out that there is a blog dedicated to the “LaTeX fetish”, which sounds to me like an perfect illustration of Internet vigilantism, especially with arguments like “free and open source software has a strong tendency towards being difficult to install and get up and running”.