On Friday, I give a talk in München on ABC model choice. At the Max-Planck Institute for Astrophysics. As coincidence go, I happen to talk the week after John Skilling gave a seminar there. On Bayesian tomography, not on nested sampling. And the conference organisers put the cover of the book Think Bayes: Bayesian Statistics Made Simple, written by Allen Downey, a book I reviewed yesterday night for CHANCE (soon to appear on the ‘Og!) [not that I understand the connection with the Max-Planck Institute or with my talk!, warum nicht?!] The slides are the same as in Oxford for SPA 2015:
Archive for slideshare
I spent [most of] the past week in Oxford in connection with our joint OxWaSP PhD program, which is supported by the EPSRC, and constitutes a joint Centre of Doctoral Training in statistical science focussing on data-intensive environments and large-scale models. The first cohort of a dozen PhD students had started their training last Fall with the first year spent in Oxford, before splitting between Oxford and Warwick to write their thesis. Courses are taught over a two week block, with a two day introduction to the theme (Bayesian Statistics in my case), followed by reading, meetings, daily research talks, mini-projects, and a final day in Warwick including presentations of the mini-projects and a concluding seminar. (involving Jonty Rougier and Robin Ryder, next Friday). This approach by bursts of training periods is quite ambitious in that it requires a lot from the students, both through the lectures and in personal investment, and reminds me somewhat of a similar approach at École Polytechnique where courses are given over fairly short periods. But it is also profitable for highly motivated and selected students in that total immersion into one topic and a large amount of collective work bring them up to speed with a reasonable basis and the option to write their thesis on that topic. Hopefully, I will see some of those students next year in Warwick working on some Bayesian analysis problem!
On a personal basis, I also enjoyed very much my time in Oxford, first for meeting with old friends, albeit too briefly, and second for cycling, as the owner of the great Airbnb place I rented kindly let me use her bike to go around, which allowed me to go around quite freely! Even on a train trip to Reading. As it was a road racing bike, it took me a trip or two to get used to it, especially on the first day when the roads were somewhat icy, but I enjoyed the lightness of it, relative to my lost mountain bike, to the point of considering switching to a road bike for my next bike… I had also some apprehensions with driving at night, which I avoid while in Paris, but got over them until the very last night when I had a very close brush with a car entering from a side road, which either had not seen me or thought I would let it pass. Gave me the opportunity of shouting Oï!
Here are my slides (or at least the current version thereof) for my talk in Hong Kong at the 2013 (59th ISI) World Statistical Congress. (I stopped embedding my slideshare links in the posts as they freeze my broswer. I wonder if anyone else experiences the same behaviour.)
This talk will feature in the History I: Jacob Bernoulli’s “Ars Conjectandi” and the emergence of probability invited paper session organised by Adam Jakubowski. While my own research connection with Bernoulli is at most tenuous, besides using the Law of Large Numbers and Bernoulli rv’s…, I [of course!] borrowed from earlier slides on our vanilla Rao-Blackwellisation paper (if only because of the Bernoulli factory connection!) and ask Mark Girolami for his Warwick slides on the Russian roulette (another Bernoulli factory connection!), before recycling my Budapest slides on ABC. The other talks in the session are by Edith Dudley Sylla on Ars Conjectandi and by Krzys Burdzy on his book The Search for Certainty. Book that I critically reviewed in Bayesian Analysis. This will be the first time I meet Krzys in person and I am looking forward to the opportunity!
Similar to last year, I am giving a series of lectures on simulation jointly as a Master course in Paris-Dauphine and as a 3rd year course in ENSAE. The course borrows from both the books Monte Carlo Statistical Methods and from Introduction to Monte Carlo Methods with R, with George Casella. Here are the three series of slides I will use throughout the course this year, mostly for the benefit of the students:
(the last series is much improved when compared with an earlier version, thanks to Olivier Cappé!)
I am back in Bristol just a few months after an earlier SuSTain workshop. (During my Spring UK trip to Bristol, Glasgow, and Edinburgh…) The theme of the workshop is Structure and uncertainty modelling, inference and computation in complex stochastic systems. And it enjoys a very rich program over the four days! I am talking about ABC and empirical likelihood, with the following slides I just completed:
Unsurprisingly, those slides borrow both from my earlier talks in Kyoto and Australia, and from Pierre Purdlo’s earlier talk on this paper… (I also added pictures of some of the hikes and climbs Peter Green and I survived together!)
I alas arrived too late for today’s sessions, having to give the opening lecture at my Statistics Master in Paris-Dauphine. (I will also alas miss half of Thursday’s talks!) As I am staying at the Avon Gorge Hotel, just next to the bridge, I took the opportunity of some remaining daylight to go running across Brunel’s bridge and into the nearby park of Leigh Woods. It happened to be very muddy thanks to the torrential rains of the morning, but it was a good way to test my recovering knee (after a minor bike fall last week!) on a long run… And it apparently held, although tomorrow morning run will tell for sure.
Here is an email from SlideShare I received yesterday:
Congrats! Your documents on SlideShare have had 100,000 views. Wow! You must be doing something right.
Only an exceptionally few reach this milestone.
Find out where your viewers are coming from. Sign up for one month free trial of SlideShare PRO account.
I wonder how much of a spam this is: with 69 presentations on line, this would mean each is viewed 1500 times, which sounds difficult to believe….