Into the wild

Over the past week, I have been watching Into the Wild with my daughter, one chapter at a time. This is a movie I was eager to see, primarily because most of it takes place in the Denali National Park. The views of the Alaskan wilderness are indeed spectacular and may justify watching the movie per se… The story itself is one of a planned suicide, with a kind of beauty in its relation to wilderness, but a suicide nonetheless. The main character (Alex/Christopher) moves into the Denali wilderness to cut all links with society and parents, and, inevitably, this ultimate rejection of society must meet with death once Alex runs out of bullets, matches or rice. The partial incoherence of his behaviour is well-exposed in the movie, when he burns his dollar bills in front of his useless car before working on a farm and cashing his salary, or when he buries his Thoreau and Walden books before digging them out a few weeks later. The scene where Alex kills a moose for food is a sad signal of how inadapted he is to the wilderness, ending up wasting the whole moose for lack of planning. The last chapter where he tries to get back into society somehow redeems the movie by giving depth to the character and by infusing a longing for alternative choices. His lonely death then does not seem so meaningless as it did in the midst of the movie.

The story is clearly compelling and I wish I had read the Into the Wild book before, as Jon Krakauer is also the writer of Into Thin Air that kept me mesmerised till the end of the book! But I cannot say I find the movie particularly well-done. The filming is unimaginative,  fakely amateurish with cuts of faded family videos and cheap multiple frames, while the acting is not always convincing. (Kristen Stewart is just as terrible as in Twilight!) As written above, the character of Alex only gets convincing when we realise he is doomed. Before that, he seems more like a spoiled child wasting opportunities and blind to the worth of the great people he meets.

2 Responses to “Into the wild”

  1. le film est effectivement un peu decevant, voire beaucoup… le montage est parfois clipesque quand il devrait etre plus sobre et n’a pas su restituer l’atmosphere du livre, nettement plus sombre…
    en meme temps, le livre merite-t-il tout le battage qu’il a pu engendrer???
    je ne saurais juger… si ce n’est que je ne fus pas hautement emballe… c’est tres attendu et tres convenu pour une grande partie alors que le but etait certainement de choquer… surprendre…
    repris par certains comme une fable ecologiste, un retour a la terre… ce qui est quand meme hautement risible car ce n’est vraiment que l’histoire d’un djeunz a la derive… qui part pour une vie marginale/suicidaire… alors juste un manifeste djeunz…?? je n’en sais rien… mais indubitablement ni un grand film, ni un grand livre…

    • Je n’ai pas lu le livre, mais je te crois et te suis sur la perspective finale livre+film, il n’y a pas de “role model” ni de perspective écologiste, simplement une histoire de dérive qui aurait pu finir mal beaucoup plus tot, par exemple durant la flash flood ou la descente des rapides en kayak… on pourrait dire que le film s’abstient de juger et reproduit en neutre une histoire, cependant la mise en scène transforme bien Alex en héros et la fin christique est complètement ratée. Mais j’ai retrouvé avec plaisir les paysages du Denali!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: