new arXiv rendering
arXiv is now testing a new display of papers in html format to increase accessibility [for those with no pdf reader?] Hopefully, this will not induce further constraints on the LaTeX format of arXiv submissions, at a time when it got easier for off-the-shelf files to be immediately accepted, but the fact that the site encourages using Overleaf is not that promising… (The plea that readers do not create reports that the HTML paper doesn’t look exactly like the PDF paper is hilarious, as I presume many complained of exactly this drawback.)
Xi'an's Og 
May 7, 2024 at 8:44 pm
Thank you for your comments, David, which go deeper than my superficial reaction at this improvement. As a user of arXiv on my laptop and solely my laptop, I am not accounting for the growing generation of phone users.
May 7, 2024 at 4:00 pm
Not saying you’re wrong or anything, but my take on this is very different.
I think this is a brilliant initiative from arXiv.org. It provides authors with a way to make their work more widely readable, without making any new rules for arXiv submission.
The arXiv.org link near the top of your post explains the purpose well, I think.
It is definitely not about “those with no pdf reader” (indeed, I do not know of anyone in that category — but I suppose they might exist!)
I am no expert on text-to-speech etc. But I do know that on my mobile phone it is much easier to read text/maths/graphs in HTML than to try reading a PDF with its too-small fonts and too-wide pages.
I am not aware that arXiv encourages the use of Overleaf. The closest I found to that, when I looked just now, was not close at all: at https://info.arxiv.org/help/submit_latex_best_practices.html there is only a recommendation (for people completely new to LaTeX) of Overleaf’s tutorial pages. In arXiv.org’s main page about how to make a TeX submission, there are repeated mentions of Overleaf but in essence they say (repeatedly) please take care if you’re using Overleaf. Have I missed something?
As for “hilarious”: I would instead say “important”. The reason for not currently wanting error reports of that kind is a good one, and is well explained on the arXiv.org page that you linked above. In essence:
Enough? I think so. Sorry if I seem crabbit, but I just think we should be positive about this development.
May 14, 2024 at 4:54 pm
However, after several tries to read some papers via this presentation, I found it much harder than using the associated pdf file, resorting to the later after a first attempt at the html version. I am possibly having more potential repeated falls of focus (!) but this alternative does not seem suited to my reading and understanding abilities.