the paper where you are a node
Sophie Donnet pointed out to me this arXived paper by Tianxi Li, Elizaveta Levina, and Ji Zhu, on a network resampling strategy for X validation, where I appear as a datapoint rather than as a [direct] citation! Which reminded me of the “where you are the hero” gamebooks with which my kids briefly played, before computer games took over. The model selection method is illustrated on a dataset made of X citations [reduced to 706 authors] in all papers published between 2003 and 2012 in the Annals of Statistics, Biometrika, JASA, and JRSS Series B. With the outcome being the determination of a number of communities, 20, which the authors labelled as they wanted, based on 10 authors with the largest number of citations in the category. As it happens, I appear in the list, within the “mixed (causality + theory + Bayesian)” category (!), along with Jamie Robbins, Paul Fearnhead, Gilles Blanchard, Zhiqiang Tan, Stijn Vansteelandt, Nancy Reid, Jae Kwang Kim, Tyler VanderWeele, and Scott Sisson, which is somewhat mind-boggling in that I am pretty sure I never quoted six of these authors [although I find it hilarious that Jamie appears in the category, given that we almost got into a car crash together, at one of the Valencià meetings!].
Related
This entry was posted on February 5, 2019 at 12:19 am and is filed under Books, Statistics, University life with tags Annals of Statistics, Bayesian inference, Biometrika, car crash, causality, citation map, Cross Validation, gamebook, JASA, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, JRSSB, resampling, Series B, social networks, Valencia conferences, Where is Wally?. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Responses to “the paper where you are a node”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
February 5, 2019 at 9:42 pm
So after a long journey, the data analyst finally becomes a single datum. ;-)
I’m probably one of those data points too. A much less relevant one, of course.
Best regards,
Paulo.
February 5, 2019 at 10:21 pm
Thank you, Paulo. All points were created equal!